”¨@ˆÄŽRŽq
Vampire
Innocence
?K?N?g?????D???ł????I
Posts: 628
|
Post by ”¨@ˆÄŽRŽq on May 10, 2004 16:13:54 GMT 10
oh HELL NO! I LOVED the movie and hugh jackman is worth DROOLING FOR! because I saw the movie, yup! *Drools*
god he is SO sexy! *drools*
|
|
Gothika
Fledgling
Devils Concubine
...Queen of Sarcasm...
Posts: 53
|
Post by Gothika on May 10, 2004 20:07:24 GMT 10
Charlotte...
Calm....down......NOW!!!
LOL, Hugh Jackman is so cool, he's such a wonderful guy!
I love being Aussie!
|
|
”¨@ˆÄŽRŽq
Vampire
Innocence
?K?N?g?????D???ł????I
Posts: 628
|
Post by ”¨@ˆÄŽRŽq on May 11, 2004 12:59:48 GMT 10
Alright, alright I'm calmed........but I wasn't calmed when I was watching the movie *glees*
though since there was a cute guy sitting one sit next to me...I though I'd scream it in my head.
it does't help that I was horny as well. LOL!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Count David on Jun 22, 2004 7:27:35 GMT 10
Sighs! I can't believe that anyone would think this was a good movie. Sighs again. I thought the movie to be a typicall American movie. It was "based" on pieces of classical literature and not one of the story even had the same ideas or characters. Dracula is seen in full light and with his brides. AND for the last time Frankenstein is the scienist not the monster. Ok that was the end of my rant.
|
|
|
|
Post by Minara on Jun 22, 2004 10:47:13 GMT 10
Sighs! I can't believe that anyone would think this was a good movie. Sighs again. I thought the movie to be a typicall American movie. It was "based" on pieces of classical literature and not one of the story even had the same ideas or characters. Dracula is seen in full light and with his brides. AND for the last time Frankenstein is the scienist not the monster. Ok that was the end of my rant. Well, I thought it was a good film just for it's entertainment value, but in terms of it's accuracy and storyline, it was shoddy. I think that effects were great and Jackman is a decent actor, but it's clearly not as good as I thought it was going to be. Min P.S. I knew that the scientist's name was Frankenstein! =) |
|
|
|
Post by The Count David on Jun 23, 2004 15:34:22 GMT 10
sorry the whole scientist thing is really pissing me off lately couldn't tell you why
|
|
|
|
Post by † Lestat † on Jun 23, 2004 23:35:22 GMT 10
Sighs! I can't believe that anyone would think this was a good movie. Sighs again. I thought the movie to be a typicall American movie. It was "based" on pieces of classical literature and not one of the story even had the same ideas or characters. Dracula is seen in full light and with his brides. Well personally I wouldnt have cared if it was a mix of a million different stories all conflicting each other as I went to see it because of the effects and because of it having a few Australian actors in it. But it would be a boring world if we all had the same opinion or were all experts on everything or all looked the same... ok so I've raving a bit here but hey thats what makes me me ;D AND for the last time Frankenstein is the scienist not the monster. Ok that was the end of my rant. Ok so I'm guessing here that something happened before you logged on and posted that had to do with Frankenstein  Cause I didnt notice anywhere in these posts where anyone here even mentioned Frankenstein or his monster ;D |
|
|
|
Post by The Count David on Jun 24, 2004 3:27:46 GMT 10
and
|
|
|
|
Post by Minara on Jun 24, 2004 9:05:20 GMT 10
Ok boys relax, don't let the hormones fly! =)
Well, Lestat, all I have to say is that you and Louis think similarly when it comes to patriotism...Aussies rock!
Quick now, show of hands: Who else thought David Wenham was funnier than hell in this flick? =)
Oh and Malaika, you really need to calm your estrogen levels, sista! =)
Min
|
|
|
|
Post by Lodemai on Jun 24, 2004 12:18:49 GMT 10
If any of you want to rant or debate about names of scientists or their creations there is a section called Heated Topics where you can go to vent and let out your agression or just your view.  Min I loved David Wenham and it was fantastic to have him as the funny one in this movie. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by wishlesshollow on Jun 26, 2004 4:38:24 GMT 10
i loved the film i thought that it was great
It was well worth having to wait for and i thought that it was a good general film
|
|
|
|
Post by Minara on Jun 26, 2004 21:35:27 GMT 10
Min I loved David Wenham and it was fantastic to have him as the funny one in this movie. ;D Well I won't lie, the only other films I have see Wenham in are LotR (which he was most excellent in) and The Crocodile Hunter: Collison Course (Yes I love Steve Irwin...it's seriously my favorite show!) Wenham rocks! Min |
|
Gothika
Fledgling
Devils Concubine
...Queen of Sarcasm...
Posts: 53
|
Post by Gothika on Jul 5, 2004 12:18:22 GMT 10
You watched Collision Course?
You poor thing! How many fingers am I holding up?
|
|
|
|
Post by Minara on Jul 6, 2004 22:58:04 GMT 10
*shrug* Dunno, Jade...can't see your hand.
Come now, CC isn't that bad...it's just the typical Irwin behaviour =) So the acting wasn't the best and the story was dumb, but it was fun and somewhat amusing =)
Min
|
|
”¨@ˆÄŽRŽq
Vampire
Innocence
?K?N?g?????D???ł????I
Posts: 628
|
Post by ”¨@ˆÄŽRŽq on Jul 7, 2004 11:19:41 GMT 10
Really I thought the monk...the guy who played the monk was so familiar and now I know why, because, yea you already said it, david wenham, and I totally reconized him from the LOTR triligy.
and so what if I am a bit gulliable? *laughs* took me couple of looks before I figured it out. hehe.
Second, Minara, darling, I'm already calmed down, then again I just like Hugh for some.....strange reason *winks*
but I'm over him and loving another aussie guy. LOL.
|
|
